Untitled Document
city_scene
The Law Offices of Siler & Ingber, LLP publishes this website as a service to you for informational purposes only. It is NOT to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should NOT act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. This is an attorney advertisement.
SILER & INGBER, LLP
nav_background
Call Today For A Free Consultation
1.877.LAW.4343 (1.877.529.4343)
Long Island Personal Injury Attorney | Auto Accident Lawyer New York | Personal Injury Lawyer In Brooklyn | Construction Accident Lawyer New York | NY Law Construction Attorney | New York Slip And Fall Accident Attorney | Motorcycle Accident Lawyer New York | Dog Bite Lawyer New York

Another problem is the apparent lack of coordination among the agency’s three centers that regulate medical products—the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, and the Center for Devices and Radiologic Health—which leads to inconsistency in inspections. “Uncertainty of timing and lack of coordination impede FDA’s ability to conduct [bioresearch monitoring] inspections,” Levinson wrote.
Among the study’s key findings:

The FDA inspected fewer than 1 percent of company-funded clinical trials during fiscal years 2000 to 2005.
The agency has 200 inspectors, some of whom audit trials part time, to inspect about 350,000 sites.
The FDA does not keep a complete database of all clinical trials it monitors, so it does not have an accurate record of how safe the trials are, or how they compare to past ones.
Most (75 percent) of the inspections were so-called surveillance inspections, meaning they focused on the trials’ clinical results, not on the well-being of the human subjects.

The OIG also expressed concern about the FDA’s reliance on voluntary compliance and low rates of follow-up after discovering violations of agency policy. The FDA issues three levels of response to violations: NAI (no action indicated), VAI (voluntary action indicated), and OAI (official action indicated). The study found that in 70 percent of the OAI cases, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research downgraded the inspectors’ findings to VAI status. And of 348 OAIs, only 26 companies were disqualified from conducting further clinical trials.

The study recommended that the FDA establish a database of all ongoing trials and a complete registry of research-ethics boards, and that it maintain better records of its trial inspections. Levinson also stressed that the agency should exert more authority over those involved in designing and running the studies.

“FDA should consider seeking additional authority that covers all of the stakeholders in the management and conduct of clinical trials,” he wrote. “In particular, FDA should consider seeking authority to include the colleagues and subordinates of a clinical investigator if they participate in the conduct of a clinical trial.”